Canada · Public sector policy

Ontario Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence Directive

Ontario's Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence Directive sets AI risk management, disclosure and reporting rules for ministries and provincial agencies.

Ontario's Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence Directive, in effect since 1 December 2024, requires every Ontario ministry and provincial agency that uses AI in a government policy, program or service to apply AI risk management across the AI lifecycle, report its AI use cases and risks each year, publish a list of its AI use cases, and tell the public when they interact directly with AI or when AI affects decisions about them. It is built on six principles, from benefit to Ontarians to accountability with ongoing human oversight.

What it is

The Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence Directive is a Management Board of Cabinet directive issued under Ontario’s Management Board of Cabinet Act. It took effect on 1 December 2024 and sets requirements for the transparent, responsible and accountable use of AI by the Government of Ontario. The Ministry of Public and Business Service Delivery and Procurement is responsible for it.

The directive is built on six principles. AI use should benefit Ontarians, be justified, proportionate, reliable and valid, be safe, secure and privacy-protective, affirm human rights and avoid discrimination, be transparent, and be accountable, with ongoing human oversight and a way to raise concerns.

Who it applies to

It applies to all ministries and provincial agencies that use AI systems, or services with AI functionality, in developing, delivering or making decisions about a government policy, program or service. AI that is procured, developed in-house or publicly available is all in scope.

An AI system is a machine-based system that infers from its inputs how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations or decisions. The AI lifecycle runs through planning and design, data collection and processing, model building and use, verification and validation, deployment, and operation and monitoring.

Exemptions are possible only in exceptional circumstances, with Management Board of Cabinet approval on a business case.

What it requires

AI risk management. Ministries apply AI risk management aligned with the Ontario Public Service risk management process, in five steps.

  • state the objectives and context, documenting the problem AI is meant to solve and whether using AI is justified
  • identify the risks
  • assess them to set the risk level, which drives proportionate controls
  • plan and act, applying risk-based controls
  • report and monitor, keeping assessments current and re-applying controls as things change

Validation runs through existing IT and digital governance processes, and the risk work is meant to sit alongside, not duplicate, privacy impact assessments and threat risk assessments.

Reporting and publication. Ministries report their AI use cases and risks to the responsible ministry every year, and coordinate with it to publish a list of AI use cases.

Public disclosure. Where the public interacts directly with AI, or AI affects decisions about them, the ministry discloses the use and provides an accessible way to seek information about it. The directive says this does not create a new appeal route.

Provincial agencies. Agencies apply the same risk management, with risk-based approval processes, keep records of their risk assessments and controls, publish their own list of AI use cases, report to their accountable ministry, and meet the same disclosure requirements.

Deputy ministers and agency heads are accountable for implementation. The Chief Information Security Officer advises on AI security controls, and the directive is reviewed at least every two years.

Key dates

  • 1 December 2024. Directive takes effect.
  • 7 January 2026. Most recent update to the published directive.

How it relates to other frameworks

The directive is Ontario’s counterpart to the federal Directive on Automated Decision-Making. The federal directive is narrower in scope, covering administrative decisions, but more prescriptive, with a published Algorithmic Impact Assessment and impact levels. Ontario’s covers any AI use in policies, programs and services and leaves the risk method to the ministry.

Its five risk management steps follow the same shape as the Map, Measure and Manage functions of the NIST AI RMF. Private employers in Ontario have a separate, narrow duty to disclose AI screening in job postings.

A note on this page

This is Aicura’s reading of the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence Directive. It is not legal advice and it is not the directive itself. Read the directive published by the Government of Ontario, and take advice on how it applies to your organisation.

Last reviewed 18 October 2026. This page explains the framework to support your governance work. It is not legal advice; read the official source for the authoritative text.

Questions

Who does the Ontario directive apply to?

All Ontario ministries and provincial agencies that use AI systems, or services with AI functionality, in developing, delivering or making decisions about a government policy, program or service. That includes AI that is procured, built in-house or publicly available.

Does it apply to municipalities, hospitals or school boards?

No. The directive covers the Ontario Public Service and provincial agencies. The Enhancing Digital Security and Trust Act, 2024, enacted by Bill 194, gives the province power to set AI requirements for a wider range of public sector entities by regulation.

What must ministries disclose to the public?

Where the public interacts directly with AI, such as a chatbot, or where AI affects decisions about them, such as eligibility for a benefit, the ministry must disclose the AI use and give an accessible way to ask about it. Ministries also coordinate with the responsible ministry to publish a list of their AI use cases.

Does it apply to suppliers?

Not directly. It binds ministries and agencies, but because it covers procured AI and AI functionality in services the government buys, suppliers can expect to be asked for the information ministries need for their risk assessments and disclosures.

Start with the AI you run

Every framework begins with knowing which AI systems and agents you have. The AI register is free to start.